Last Friday night (20) Google countered a request from United States Justice Department, which I wanted the company to sell Chrome browser, as the technology giant built a monopoly on Internet search systems. To formalize the disagreement against the agency, Google presented a 12 -page proposal that suggests less drastic measures, such as limiting the distribution agreement of its services to associated companies and revoking the obligation of pre -installed applications on devices.
The judicial battle between Google and the United States government has been dragging since 2020, when the United States Justice Department He processed the technology company with the pretext that the company had created an illegal monopoly within the Internet searches and the advertising segment. According to this thought, Google promotes unfair competition against other technology companies, such as Apple, Mozilla and Samsung. Then see more information about the new chapter in this judicial case.
For those who are in a hurry:
- It United States Justice Department It required Google to give up different resources to end the company’s “illegal monopoly” in the business of business mechanisms;
- Google launched a counterproposal last Friday (20), where it stands out This will not sell Chrome and there are less drastic solutions to solve the whole problem;
- The proposals of both parties will be analyzed and discussed in a trial scheduled for April 2025.
Google proposes smoother solutions so you don’t lose dominance over Chrome browser
In 2020, a court battle began in the United States: the United States Department of Nations, along with other states, began a lawsuit against Google, claiming that the company had built an illegal monopoly on Internet search and search systems. This problem, defended by the United States Court, states this The company causes unfair competition with other companies of the same branch and the activities of which they depend significantly on the search and advertising on the Internet.
Last month, the United States Government proposed that the problem be easily resolved if Google came to the Chrome browser (which is currently the most popular in the world), among other actions. In a counterargument, Google launched last night, Friday (20), which It does not intend to give up your browser or Android operating system that the solution to the whole problem would be much easier than it seems.
Read -Ne More:
In a 12 -page document you can read entirely by clicking here, the technological giant suggests much less radical measures to solve the “illegal monopoly on Internet search systems”. Among some of the main ones, we can mention two:
- Limit service distribution agreements: That is, the services offered by the company are not unique or the only ones in which an electronic car maker may, for example, have decentralization, for example, the use of Google Chrome;
- Revoke the pre -installation of the application: This means that several applications would not come from the factory of your Android smartphone, such as Google and Google Play.
In the argument provided by the Department of Justice, Google’s history is to pay thousands of dollars to companies like Apple, Mozilla and Samsung, so their search engine is the standard system in smartphones and Internet browsers. The argument also emphasizes that these commercial agreements They were designed spontaneously to ensure Google’s dominance over other companies and to do unfair competition.
One of the most successful strategies of the company is the cozy control that retains in the user’s search data, They are collected and used to ensure that the search engine will be the best among others, maintaining a “faithful clientele”. United States justice has even requested that Google deliver your search data to its competitors that it has collected to users; The company, on the other hand, has previously counted that it only created the best product. The document published by them also does not present or do not share or not this data.
All proposals will be analyzed and discussed in a trial that should occur in April 2025, in which the court will be responsible for deciding what will be or not to implement.
